On The City Council Agenda – May 6, 2014

Hidden Agenda ClipartIt’s been a nice but short vacation since the Tustin City Council had an extra week off this past month. And, while the last meeting in April was extremely short, don’t expect that to happen again, at least for awhile.

Highlighting the agenda this week is a second go at implementing a land exchange between the city and the Army Reserve that would, in effect, move the Army Reserve to another parcel of MCAS property off Warner Avenue and Redhill. The deal had already been agreed upon a few months ago but, the bureaucracy is never satisfied. The Feds wanted a few changes to documentation and to the deal itself. City staff assure us the essentials are the same and the most important issue for the taxpayer, a no cost swap, is intact.

Although construction of new Reserve facilities will take some time to complete (I’d say at least two years), the city has agreed to a lease back of the existing facilities to the Army at no cost to them. Relocation of the Reserve Center is a win-win for the city and the Feds. Let’s hope it sticks this time.

If you plan on buying one of the recently approved homes being built by Standard Pacific, expect to pay for the privilege through a Mello-Roos tax being pondered at tonight’s meeting. The City Council will no doubt go along with staff recommendations to saddle new homeowners in the area with a $29 million dollar bond issue to finance what should be financed by the developers and the city.

The tax includes infrastructure for the TUSD as well. However, an opt-out clause would lower the tax should the school district decide to finance their own CFD in the same area. Either way, the new homeowner should be wary as the CFD(s) could cost a significant amount with a questionable return. Our opinion is that Mello-Roos should have been eliminated along with Redevelopment Agencies.

In other business, city staff are recommending a change to city ordinances in regard to Waste Reduction and Recycling Plans. As new state laws have been effected, city ordinances require modification. As staff anticipate future changes to state CALGreen laws, they are suggesting incorporating future changes by reference. A great idea as long as staff stay on top of future changes.

Closed Session

Conference With Legal Counsel – Initiation and Exposure to Litigation, 2 items each.

Conference With Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation

Conference With Real Property Negotiators

MCAS Property – Tustin Unified School District

Boys & Girls Club – 580 W. 6th St.

MCAS Property – South Orange County Community College District

MCAS Property – Pacific Coast Investors

U.S. Army Reserve – Land swap, current facilities for equal parcel located at Warner & Redhill

Regular Session

Public Hearing Item 1

Community Develpment Block Grant Funding Allocation, Fiscal Year 2014-15 Action Plan. $688,674. Proposed recipients include:

Boys & Girls Club

Senior Meals

Graffiti Removal

Laurel & Mercy House

Parks and Recreation Department

Public Facilities Improvements

CDBG money will also be used to finance the Old Town Study.

Resolution 14-30 – Accept Armstrong Avenue and Warner Avenue Improvements.

CIP NO. 10048 – Accept Improvements for the Tustin Legacy Fire Station Relocation Station No. 37.

Regular Business

Request Travel Approval – Mayor Murray to travel to Washington DC with OCTA, ACC-OC and the Orange County Business Council for unspecified purposes. Cost of conference is $2,800 including travel expenses. The only thing we have to wonder is, whose interests will Murray be advocating for since he is a member of all three entities. For that matter, why isn’t ACC-OC, a quasi-governmental PR agency funded solely by represented cities, or OCTA paying Murray’s way?



About Jeff Gallagher

I am a retired peace officer from the 2nd largest law enforcement agency in Orange County. I live in and love Tustin where my family and I have resided for the past 25 years. I am a highly moderate libertarian that despises hardcore Republicans, Democrats and anyone else who is not willing to compromise for the good of the people.

Posted on May 6, 2014, in Local Government, politics, Tustin City Council and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 1 Comment.

%d bloggers like this: